Improvement on Waste Segregation Knowledge by Verbal and Visual Prompt in Indonesia International Institute for Life Sciences (i3L)

  • Deborah Shirleen Institut Bio Scientia Internasional Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Katherine Kho Institut Bio Scientia Internasional Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3020-6996
Keywords: verbal prompt, waste sorting behavior, visual prompt, subjective norm, sustainable

Abstract

In the face of the detrimental effect from the abundant waste, humans were left with no choice but to cycle them. Waste sorting, an important step to maximize the recyclables resources, is essential to be performed. To reinforce the waste sorting behavior, this study observed the impact of verbal prompt intervention. The experiment was done at a higher education institution, Indonesia International Institute for Life Sciences (i3L), that integrates sustainability education into their curriculum. This study observed convenient sampling of one group, pre- and post- intervention. Volunteers stand by and notify wrong waste generators for one hour in the communal cafeteria for one month, after one week of baseline observation. The observation revealed a sufficient number of knowledge on waste sorting on the pre-intervention baseline (75%). The presence of the prolonged intervention increased the number of correct waste sorting to 89.68% in the fourth week of intervention. Nonetheless, a survey conducted to confirm the cause of change, disclosed that the community’s heightened proper waste behavior is independent of the direct reminder, but rather due to the presence of the notifying volunteer. Therefore the root of waste segregation behavior improvement was more than just from verbal reminder, but from the presence of the rangers that enforces the rules.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Deborah Shirleen, Institut Bio Scientia Internasional Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia

Department of Biotechnology, Institut Bio Scientia Internasional Indonesia

Katherine Kho, Institut Bio Scientia Internasional Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia

Department of Biotechnology, Institut Bio Scientia Internasional Indonesia

References

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211.
Ajzen, I. (2005). EBOOK: Attitudes, Personality and Behaviour. McGraw-hill education (UK).
Christensen, T. H., & Matsufuji, Y. (2011). Solid waste technology & management. John Wiley & Sons.
Gunawan, J., Permatasari, P., & Fauzi, H. (2022). The evolution of sustainability reporting practices in Indonesia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 358, 131798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131798
Hao, M., Zhang, D., & Morse, S. (2020). Waste separation behaviour of college students under a mandatory policy in China: A case study of Zhengzhou city. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(21), 8190. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218190
Hayes, D. (2013). The Use of Prompting as an Evidence-Based Strategy to Support Children with ASD in School Settings in New Zealand. Kairaranga, 14(2), 52-56.
Hutner, P., Thorenz, A., & Tuma, A. (2017). Waste prevention in communities: A comprehensive survey analyzing status quo, potentials, barriers and measures. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.156
Iqbal, S., Naz, T., & Naseem, M. (2021). Challenges and opportunities linked with waste management under Global Perspective: A mini review. Journal of Quality Assurance in Agricultural Sciences, 1(01), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.52862/jqaas.2021.1.1.2
Kennedy, D. M. (2012). Deterrence and crime prevention: Reconsidering the prospect of sanction. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203892022
Kusumaningrum, L., Dewi, I. R., Ulya, F. D., Sitepu, J. A. P., Izdihar, R. S., & Pramitasari, T. A. (2020). Comparison of Waste Management between Indonesia and South Korea. Journal of Global Environmental Dynamics, 1(1), 13-19.
Ferrara, E. L. (2003). Kin groups and reciprocity: A model of credit transactions in Ghana. American Economic Review, 93(5), 1730–1751. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803322655518
Ličen, M., Hartmann, F., Repovš, G., & Slapničar, S. (2016). The impact of social pressure and monetary incentive on cognitive control. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00093
Ma, J., & Hipel, K. W. (2016). Exploring social dimensions of municipal solid waste management around the globe – A systematic literature review. Waste Management, 56, 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.06.041
Mazarr, M. J. (2021). Understanding deterrence. NL ARMS Netherlands Annual Review of Military Studies 2020, 13-28.
Stöckli, S., Dorn, M., & Liechti, S. (2018). Normative prompts reduce consumer food waste in restaurants. Waste Management, 77, 532–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.04.047
Sussman, R., Greeno, M., Gifford, R., & Scannell, L. (2012). The effectiveness of models and prompts on waste diversion: A field experiment on composting by cafeteria patrons. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(1), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00978.x
Zanjani, A. J., Kiani, B., Saeedi, M., & Vosoogh, A. (2012). The effect of the waste separation policy in municipal solid waste management using the system dynamic approach. International Journal of Environmental Health Engineering, 1(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.4103/2277-9183.94389
Zeki, S., Goodenough, O. R., Chorvat, T., & McCabe, K. (2004). The brain and the law. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 359(1451), 1727–1736. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1545
Zhang, D., Huang, G., Yin, X., & Gong, Q. (2015). Residents’ waste separation behaviors at the source: Using SEM with the theory of planned behavior in Guangzhou, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12(8), 9475–9491. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120809475
Zhang, H., Liu, J., Wen, Z.-guo, & Chen, Y.-X. (2017). College students’ municipal solid waste source separation behavior and its influential factors: A case study in Beijing, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 164, 444–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.224
Published
2023-03-24
How to Cite
Shirleen, D., & Kho, K. (2023). Improvement on Waste Segregation Knowledge by Verbal and Visual Prompt in Indonesia International Institute for Life Sciences (i3L). Indonesian Journal of Life Sciences, 5(01), 52-57. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54250/ijls.v5i01.171
Section
Bio-product and Services for Sustainable Society